CABA Newsletter – December 2023

Welcome to the Winter 2023 issue of the Canadian American Bar Association’s newsletter.  In this and future issues, we will highlight CABA’s recent activities, as well as priorities set by the CABA executive, in consultation with CABA’s advisory board and its membership at large.  In this issue, we focus in particular on CABA’s recent efforts with respect to the transmission of Canadian citizenship abroad.

Photo of the canadian flag and the american flag

CABA’s Cross-Border Initiatives

As a cross-border legal association, CABA’s leadership, advisory board and membership have a unique interest in furthering the rights of Canadians and Americans who choose to live and work abroad.  Trends such as state-centered populism and trade protectionism, coupled with natural and man-made cross-border risks, have resulted in unique and novel tensions in the international community in which CABA’s membership operates.

These unique and growing challenges continue to be an important area of focus for CABA’s research and advocacy initiatives, with the transmission of citizenship abroad being a lynchpin issue speaking to the ability of expats to retain their connections to multiple countries at once.

CABA’s efforts in this area are a continuation of its past cross-border initiatives.  Over the course of 2017 and 2018, CABA participated in public consultation processes relating to the renegotiation of what was to become the United States Mexico Canada Agreement, focused on harmonizing cross-border legal regimes and facilitating cross-border legal practice.

In 2018, CABA made submissions to the United States Congress in favor of the retention of per-country caps on employment-based immigrant visas, which could have had a disproportionate impact on the free movement of Canadian legal practitioners across the border.

And in January 2019, in Frank v. Canada (Attorney General), a majority of the Supreme Court of Canada found that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects Canadian expats from being disenfranchised on the basis of their non-residency in Canada, a case in which CABA participated as an intervener, making both written and oral submissions before the Court in support of what became the majority position.

Related links:

Phoo of people working in a office

Cross-Border Spotlight: The First General Limitation on the Transmission of Canadian Citizenship

Canadian citizenship can be passed on through various means, including being born to Canadian parents, being born in Canada and becoming a naturalized citizen of Canada.  What may be less well understood is that in 2009, Parliament passed legislation amending Canada’s Citizenship Act, which limited the transmission of citizenship by descent, with the effect that a Canadian parent is now only entitled to pass on their citizenship to children born abroad if the parent themselves became a citizen by birth inside Canada or by naturalization.

History and Academic Study

Purportedly implemented in the interest of fighting the phenomenon of “Canadians of convenience” who lack a true attachment to Canada, this enactment is known as the “first-generation limitation” (FGL), and represents a significant retrenchment of Canadian citizenship rights.  In addition to being more restrictive than previous Canadian rules, which generally permitted the transmission of citizenship abroad so long as individuals applied to retain their citizenship prior to their 28th birthday, it is also more limited than laws in many comparable jurisdictions.

In an effort to raise awareness on this important issue, CABA provided funding and support to University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law Professor Michael Pal and Luka Ryder-Bunting on an in-depth study – Citizenship and the First-Generation Limitation – published in the Dalhousie Law Journal.  After outlining the operation of current Canadian rules around citizenship and international comparisons, Professor Pal and Mr. Ryder-Bunting explore alternatives to the FGL and conclude that a number of them would be preferable to both the status quo or the pre-2009 rules.

CABA views the publication of this paper as an important contribution to cross-border scholarship, as well as to the rights of Canadians, including many of its members, living abroad.

Related links:

Legislative and Judicial Developments

The legal community has not stood still in the face of the challenges posed by the FGL.  The relevant provisions have recently been challenged in Canadian court as violating various guarantees of Canada’s Charter, including by discriminating on the basis of national origin and sex, curtailing mobility rights and other grounds.

The constitutional challenge – Bjorkquist et al. v. AG Canada – commenced in 2021 and a decision remains pending before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, with the potential for the decision being appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal once issued.

Related links:

A Senate bill, S-245, also seeks to address some of the imperfections of the Citizenship Act, with a particular focus on “Lost Canadians” – Canadians who, because of where or when they were born, are caught up in provisions of the Act that may lead them to lose citizenship or become stateless, in particular relating to the prior requirement to re-apply for citizenship prior to their 28th birthday.  While the 2009 FGL amendments changed these rules, it did not provide a corrective to anyone who had already lost citizenship.

S-245, which is at the report stage in the House of Commons, was devised to permit certain of these Lost Canadians to regain citizenship, but also presented a broader opportunity to revisit the 2009 changes to the Citizenship Act and address their negative effects.  Indeed, the House of Commons Standing on Citizenship and Immigration recently included provisions into S-245 granting citizenship to children born abroad after April 2009 to a Canadian parent born abroad in the second generation if that parent has a substantial connection to Canada, which may provide at least a partial legislative solution to the FGL problem.  CABA will continue to closely track these important developments.

Related links:

photo of a canadian passport

Looking Forward and How You Can Help

CABA is eager to continue its advocacy and involvement in the areas of cross-border rule of law and expat citizenship rights.  In the near term, its leadership expects to submit opinion pieces for consideration in major Canadian newspapers once the Bjorkquist decision is handed down.  Looking forward, CABA also intends to explore organizing a virtual legal/policy seminar on the FGL in cooperation with the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law in 2024.

In support of the projects outlined in this newsletter, CABA would welcome inquiries from Canadian law firms and other practitioners with expertise in constitutional and other issues particularly affecting expats who would be willing to represent it on a pro bono basis in current or future proceedings relating to the FGL and other issues of interest to the cross-border expat community, including, potentially, in any appeal relating to Bjorkquist.

In furtherance of its advocacy efforts, CABA would also welcome testimonies from its membership and other affected readers of this newsletter as to how they have been impacted by the FGL, recent developments on voting rights and other cross-border issues.  Our goal is to build a robust set of personal accounts that could be deployed to illustrate the lived experiences of the North American expat community, which may include future op-ed pieces in major Canadian and U.S. newspapers, submissions to legislative bodies considering further reforms to citizenship rights or other initiatives.  Requests to remain anonymous will be honored.

In either case, please reach out to

Thank you for your interest in CABA.

The CABA Executive

Ivo Entchev                President

Julian Wright              Vice-President

Mark Semotiuk           Secretary Treasurer

Julie Lanz                   Director of Policy and Advocacy

Joanna Langille           Director of Academic Outreach

Arielle Wasserman     Director of Events and CLE Programming

Kristin Ali                   Canada Representative

Shashi Dholandas       Director of Communications

CABA Publishes Academic Study of the Transmission of Canadian Citizenship Abroad

– For Immediate Release –

New York, NY, September 16, 2022:

The Dalhousie Law Journal has published an independent academic study supported by the Canadian American Bar Association focusing on the First Generation Limitation (the “FGL”) imposed on the transmission of Canadian citizenship abroad.

The study was undertaken by citizenship law professor Michael Pal and Luka Ryder-Bunting of the University of Ottawa with support from CABA’s Cross-Border Research Program.

The FGL was enacted by the Canadian Parliament in 2009. As a result, children born to Canadian parents on foreign soil will not, absent certain exceptions, acquire Canadian citizenship “by blood” — through the application of jus sanguinis — where both parents are also foreign-born. The FGL replaced a more expansive policy that permitted the transmission of Canadian citizenship to consecutive foreign-born generations, but required that these individuals apply to retain their citizenship prior to their 28th birthday. The Canadian government has justified the FGL as a way to simplify the previous law and to preclude the creation of so-called “Canadians of convenience” who lack a true attachment to Canada.

At the outset of their in-depth study, Professor Pal and Mr. Ryder-Bunting observe that the imposition of the first-generation limitation is controversial, as it is much more restrictive than the previous Canadian rules or those in many comparable jurisdictions. Their article then outlines the operation of the current Canadian rules around citizenship, analyzes the first-generation limitation, and sets out relevant international comparisons. After evaluating the current legal regime in light of debates about the principles of jus soli, jus sanguinis, and jus nexi, Professor Pal and Mr. Ryder-Bunting conclude that Canada’s regime is overly restrictive when considered against those of Canada’s international peers as well as its own legal tradition. Finally, Professor Pal and Mr. Ryder-Bunting present a range of alternatives that would better meet the underlying values of Canadian citizenship law.

Professor Pal and Mr. Ryder-Bunting’s academic study is timely. The FGL has recently been challenged in Canadian court as violating Canada’s constitution. As the only in-depth scholarly treatment of the subject, Professor Pal and Mr. Ryder-Bunting’s study is sure to be of interest to the courts and litigants involved in that dispute.

CABA’s policy and advocacy program seeks to promote the rule of law, bilateral trade and the interests of the cross-border legal community through submissions to legislative bodies, educational programs and, where appropriate, direct legal action. CABA’s support for Professor Pal and Mr. Ryder-Bunting’s academic research extends CABA’s prior work on the exercise of fundamental associational and democratic rights across borders. That work has included CABA’s participation in Supreme Court of Canada proceedings that invalidated legislative restrictions on expatriate Canadians’ right to vote in Canadian elections.

CABA’s Full Statement on the Conflict in Ukraine

– For Immediate Release –

New York, NY, March 14, 2022: As a cross-border bar association committed to the principle that a rule based international order is among the best tools we have to ensure peace, prosperity, and mutual respect across international borders, the Canadian American Bar Association is deeply concerned by Russia’s unprovoked and unlawful invasion of Ukraine and condemns it in the strongest terms.

When the United Nations was formed in 1945, the “suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace” was proclaimed as one of the organization’s founding purposes. Its charter made most uses of force illegal, aside from those authorized by the body’s Security Council “to maintain or restore international peace and security” and those undertaken in self-defense.

That rule-based international order, while admittedly flawed in its design and imperfect in its adherence, is a cornerstone of a civilized international arena that places limits on more powerful states and protects the community of sovereign nations from acts of aggression. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is a repudiation of those principles and of the multinational organizations and legal institutions created to channel and resolve international conflict.

Lawyers on both sides of the Canada and U.S. border have not hesitated in taking action that address the legal and humanitarian ramifications of the unfolding Ukraine conflict, including in legal proceedings against Russia in the International Court of Justice and amendments to immigration rules aimed at accommodating fleeing refugees. CABA is supportive of these efforts and is exploring ways of addressing the unfolding crisis that are consistent with its values and cross-border mission.

Tenth Annual Cross-Border Economic Forecast

On February 1, 2022, CABA’s partner organization, the Canada-United States Business Association, held its Tenth Annual Cross-Border Economic Forecast examining the outlook for economic and business activity on both sides of the border. Once again, the virtual seminar offers rich analysis by industry participants and policy makers and is a must watch for cross-border legal professionals. A replay of the seminar is available here. []

Registration is required.

CABA Appoints Director of Policy and Advocacy

– For Immediate Release –

New York, New York, April 30, 2021: The Canadian American Bar Association is pleased to announce the appointment of Julie Lanz as its Director of Policy and Advocacy. Julie brings a wealth of experience to CABA’s cross-border advocacy initiatives during a dynamic period for cross-border law and legal practice. Julie practiced in Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP’s corporate restructuring department in New York for 10 years.  She has represented a diverse client base in complex restructuring transactions, both in and out of court, many of which have included significant cross-border considerations.  She completed her J.D. at Osgoode Hall Law School and clerked for the Hon. Justice Ian Binnie at the Supreme Court of Canada.  She is licensed to practice in New York and Ontario. 

Ninth Annual Cross-Border Economic Forecast

On February 2, 2021, CABA’s partner organization, the Canada-United States Business Association, held its Ninth Annual Cross-Border Economic Forecast examining the outlook for economic and business activity on both sides of the border. This virtual seminar is replete with expert analysis and data-driven insights of an unprecedented time for industry actors and policy makers. It is a must watch for understanding the economic impact of the Pandemic from a cross-border perspective. A replay of the seminar is available here. Registration is required.

Canadian American Bar Association Newsletter

Welcome to the Canadian American Bar Association’s newsletter. In this and future issues, we will highlight cross-border developments and CABA’s recent activities, as well priorities set by the CABA executive in consultation with members of its advisory board and its membership at large.

Cross-Border Legal Practice Amidst a Pandemic

COVID-19 is having an unprecedented impact on Canada-U.S. relations and on the nature and means of cross-border legal practice. From border restrictions to economic hardships and the challenges of remote work, the cross-border legal industry is among many disrupted by the Pandemic and continues to adjust to a new way of doing business.

1) The Border

Half a million people and roughly $2.7 billion CAD in goods and services ordinarily cross the Canada-U.S. border every day.

The land border between the two countries was closed to non-essential travel on March 21, 2020, and border restrictions have since been renewed on a monthly basis five times, most recently through September 21, 2020. Additional targeted health-related restrictions have further limited travel, including a Canadian requirement for a two-week isolation period for most travelers returning to Canada from international destinations, a U.S. freeze on certain immigrant visas and a U.S. restriction on entry to non-citizens or permanent residents who have recently been to certain countries, including China, the Schengen area, and the United Kingdom. Limitations on cross-border mobility are exerting a heavy toll on important business travelers, retail and tourism sectors, and on cross-border communities, families, and property owners.

Five months into the land border closure, cross-border stakeholders are urging public officials to develop science-driven criteria for safely easing border restrictions. On July 3rd, members of various congressional districts along the U.S. Northern border petitioned top Canadian and U.S. officials to begin crafting a “comprehensive framework for phased reopening of the border based on objective metrics and accounting for the varied circumstances across border regions.” On July 20th, the bi-national Future Borders Coalition encouraged the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security to convene “a Joint Task Force – composed of government officials, public health experts, and supported by an Advisory Committee of private sector leaders – to begin working on a set of risk-mitigating measures and health-related protocols with a view to establishing a balanced regulatory framework for the orderly, safe, and gradual easing of border restrictions.”

These advocacy efforts are expected to continue and grow as both countries begin transitioning to a more sustainable border-crossing regime. CABA is monitoring these developments closely.

2) The Cross-Border Economy

Following a sudden and severe contraction in March, the cross-border economy has begun its recovery. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions are growing in volume and more frequently involve insolvency and restructuring components. Trade corridors are reporting that freight traffic is approaching pre-Pandemic levels as manufacturers restart operations consistent with health guidelines.

The hardest hit businesses remain those, like the hospitality industry, that rely on cross-border visitors and spending. The multi-billion-dollar tourism industry remains much diminished on both sides of the border.

The Pandemic has also presented certain regions with economic opportunity. For example, some cross-border communities are positioning themselves as regional platforms for reshoring supply chains for protective equipment and medical supplies that will serve both countries in the post-Pandemic economy. In May, the Washington-based Canadian American Business Council launched an online campaign aimed at “a common cross-border manufacturing response as we tackle the COVID-19 public health crisis and help our shared economies to rebuild and recover.”

3) Cross-Border Legal Practice

Cross-border legal practitioners are adjusting to this new business environment. Among other things, corporate deal-making now involves an intense legal focus on the distribution of risks related to health emergencies and direct governmental intervention in the economy. Rapid regulatory developments have proliferated, insurance disputes abound, and arbitration is becoming increasingly attractive as litigants seek to avoid in-person interaction and mitigate the impact of any future court closures. With business travel at a standstill and in-person interactions limited, cross-border lawyers are having to find new ways of developing business.

Here is some of what lawyers on both sides of the border are saying about cross-border legal practice in a Pandemic:

  • “From a cross-border disputes point of view, the pandemic has accelerated and expanded some practices that were already underway. We are now seeing more virtual meetings, case conferences and discoveries, of course, but also more virtual contested motions, trials, arbitrations and appeals. This has permitted some international cases to advance more quickly and cost-effectively, particularly where parties, experts and witnesses are all over the globe.” (Bradley E. Berg, Litigation & Arbitration Partner, Blakes (Toronto)).
  • “At BLG, we saw a number of deals stall at the beginning of the pandemic. While some of those transactions did not restart because of questions of valuation or otherwise, many deals have proceeded and new transactions are on the rise. As expected, we are now seeing an increase in cross-border transactions with an insolvency or restructuring component. There has also been a marked increase in cross-border tech deals, many of which are proceeding as auctions. We’ve seen a lot of creative drafting of MAE clauses and tailoring of reps and interim period covenants due to COVID, which has been interesting as deal professionals adapt to the new normal.” (Neil E. Hazan, Corporate Partner, BLG (Montreal)).
  • “Not surprisingly, the global reach of the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have had a parallel impact on both sides of the border. The slowdown (and, in some industries, screeching halt) of the economy has left U.S. and Canadian businesses and deal makers similarly impacted; first and foremost by having to deal with the resulting uncertainty which has not only affected revenues but also the availability of financing to weather the storm or pursue opportunities that have resulted from the dislocation. As the situation unfolded, many market participants have adjusted to the reality and are returning to a new normal while others have had to restructure, with industries like oil & gas, hospitality and travel being among the most affected.” (Ariel J. Deckelbaum, Mergers & Acquisitions Partner, Paul Weiss (New York)).
  • “Since the start of the pandemic, cross-border clients, particularly in the consumer product area, are increasingly relying on online marketing, branding and sales tools in order to be able to push out new advertising content and to address, not only health and safety concerns, but also social justice issues that have come to the forefront. Cross-border clients are also pivoting towards increased e-commerce traffic. For some clients, this has expanded or shifted the consumer base and/or consumer purchasing habits for their products and brought to the forefront certain legal, regulatory and contract issues, such as development of new product lines designed to better fit the ‘new normal,’ advertising disclosures,  privacy compliance and online sales terms, that may not have otherwise have been a focus.” (Sarah M. Robertson, Intellectual Property Partner, Dorsey & Whitney (New York, Toronto)).
  • “The developments on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border in the field of immigration have been so numerous and regular that it is difficult to keep up with them. Confusion over what policy rules where is part of this new normal. Clients call asking about what should be routine entry to the U.S. Canada regarding business or tourism but the answers are not routine. Borders are closed. Consulates are not operating. People sometimes cannot join their loved ones on the other side of the border and are stuck in limbo. Practicing immigration law related to cross border travel is more complicated than ever.” (Andy Semotiuk, U.S. and Canadian Immigration Attorney, Pace Law Firm (Toronto)).
  • “We are finding the cross-border travel restrictions are interfering with our practice. Both in staying in touch with existing clients and colleagues, and in making new connections, Zoom and email are not good substitutes for face-to-face interactions. The whole virtual environment feels artificial, and requires a different approach that is still being developed. It is too easy to miss non-verbal cues on a screen, and the informality that surrounds a normal meeting (standing in the hall, sharing a coffee or a drink together) is completely absent.” (Mark R. High, Member, Dickinson Wright and President of the Canada-U.S. Businesses Association (Detroit)).

CABA is making available links to additional cross-border resources relating to the Pandemic here.

Supreme Court of Canada Rules on Transnational Arbitration  in the Context of the Gig Economy

Even prior to the Pandemic, arbitration was a vital underpinning of international commerce. As we observe elsewhere in this Newsletter, this is likely to continue and accelerate in the current public health environment. As such, arbitration policy is a topic of growing interest to cross-border practitioners.

In Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16, the Supreme Court of Canada addressed the viability of arbitration involving international parties in the context of the gig economy. The case involves a class proceeding by Uber’s Ontario-based drivers against the company’s Canadian, United States, and Dutch entities for their alleged violation of provincial employment standards legislation. The trial judge initially stayed the court proceedings on Uber’s motion on the basis of an arbitration clause in the company’s services agreement purporting to refer the dispute to mediation and arbitration proceedings seated in the Netherlands. The trial judge also ruled that the drivers’ challenge to the validity of clause would be determined by the arbitrator rather than a court.

The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (8-1) upheld the Ontario Court of Appeal’s reversal of the trial judge’s order.

It held that where the claimants’ costs of initiating arbitration present a reasonable prospect that the matter will not be brought before the arbitrator, it is for the court to resolve all challenges to an arbitration clause’s validity. Finding that this principle applied to the case at hand, the Court examined Uber’s arbitration clause and found that it was the product of unequal bargaining power, represented an improvident bargain, and was therefore invalid. The Supreme Court’s ruling opens the way for Ontario’s Uber drivers to continue their suit against Uber in Ontario Superior Court. The Court’s reasons can be consulted here.

CABA participated in the appeal before the Supreme Court as an intervener with an international perspective. Without taking a position on the merits, CABA made written and oral submissions emphasizing the need for arbitration to continue serving the expectations of international parties while respecting domestic public policy objectives. CABA emphasized the need for courts to articulate predictable rules regarding when they will decide the validity of an arbitration clause, or else refer that determination to the arbitrator, and canvassed how other leading jurisdictions have crafted arbitration policy in the employment context.

United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Coming into Effect

United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Coming into Effect

On Canada Day (July 1) of this year, in the midst of the ongoing Pandemic and related threats to cross-border trade flows described elsewhere in this Newsletter, supporters of international trade on both side of the border celebrated the entry-into-force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, alternatively referred to by some as the new North American Free Trade Agreement.

The result of extensive negotiations over the past three and a half years culminating in an agreement on September 30, 2019, the USMCA preserves the important benefits of NAFTA, including tariff-free access for most goods, vital automobile supply chains and the cross-border mobility of numerous professions, while strengthening provisions dealing with labor, environmental and intellectual property considerations, among others.

CABA previously distributed a bulletin at the time the parties reached agreement over the USMCA.  Over the course of the USMCA negotiations, CABA also advocated for the preservation of certain features of NAFTA, including in particular the cross-border mobility of legal professionals.

The coming into effect of new national security-based U.S. tariffs on Canadian aluminum on August 16, 2020, a measure also taken during the course of the USMCA negotiations and on which CABA also provided submissions, demonstrates that cross-border trade negotiations will continue to preoccupy cross-border trade practitioners for the foreseeable future.

CABA White Paper on the Extraterritorial Transmission of  Citizenship

Following on from its successful work in advocating for the recognition of expatriate voting rights before the Supreme Court of Canada, CABA is pleased to announce that it is in the process of collaborating on an exhaustive comparative report on the rules for citizenship transmission to children of Canadian citizens born abroad.

In 2009, the Canadian Parliament limited the transmission of citizenship by descent in such circumstances to one generation born abroad.  Known as the “first generation limitation,” this legislation barred the eligibility of second and third generation children for citizenship in a manner that is unusually definitive, when viewed against the policies of peer countries.

The pending white paper is expected to track the evolution of citizenship transmission rules in Canada, compare the Canadian approach to that of the United States and a select group of other countries, and to outline the costs and benefits of each country’s approach, within the broader ambit of the meaning of citizenship in an interconnected world.

The project is being led by respected University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law, professor Michael Pal, an expert on democracy, comparative constitutional law, and election law. CABA anticipates making the report publicly available by 2021.

If you are interested in lending support to this project, please visit our portal or contact

Thank you for your interest in CABA.

The CABA Executive

Ivo Entchev President
Julian Wright Vice-President
Mark Semotiuk Secretary Treasurer
Julie Lanz Director of Policy and Advocacy
Joanna Langille Director of Academic Outreach
Arielle Wasserman Director of Events and CLE Programming
Kristin Ali Canada Representative
Shashi Dholandas Director of Communications


CABA is a proud supporting organization of CanArbWeek (Sept. 21-25).

CABA Appoints Director of Communications

– For Immediate Release –

New York, NY, August 24, 2020: The Canadian American Bar Association is pleased to announce the appointment of Shashi Dholandas as CABA’s Director of Communications. Shashi is a litigation and arbitration attorney at Bailey Duquette P.C. in New York, where he provides counsel to clients in both international and domestic matters.

He previously served as a Director and as International Case Counsel with the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) and ICDR Canada. Born in Montreal, but raised in New Jersey, Shashi received his B.A. from Rutgers University and his J.D. from Rutgers Law School. He is licensed to practice law in New York and New Jersey, and is an active member of the international arbitration community.

CABA Granted Leave To Intervene in Supreme Court of Canada Appeal Affecting International Arbitration

– For Immediate Release –

New York, NY, October 9, 2019: The Canadian American Bar Association (CABA) has been granted leave to intervene in Uber v. Heller, an appeal pending before the Supreme Court of Canada.

This appeal has important consequences for the institution of international arbitration, a dispute resolution tool that underpins transnational commercial dealings.

CABA is not supporting either party to the appeal and seeks to assist the Court by providing a cross-border perspective on the legal issues before it.

CABA is represented by Caza Saikaley in Ottawa.

CABA Rooftop Happy Hour at VICE

CABA Rooftop Happy Hour at VICE

The Canadian American Bar Association is hosting a small gathering and happy hour on the VICE rooftop in Williamsburg, Brooklyn this Thursday.

This event will be an opportunity to discuss recent CABA initiatives, including CABA’s Cross-Border Legal Research Program.

A huge thank you to VICE, an innovative media company with proud Canadian roots, for hosting us on its exclusive rooftop.

As spaces for this event are limited, we ask that you please RSVP as soon as possible and notify us of any cancellations. All attendees will be cleared with security prior to the event.


September 26, 7-9 pm


49 S 2nd St. Brooklyn, NY
Please RSVP to
We look forward to seeing you at the event!

The CABA Executive

Ivo Entchev President
Julian Wright Vice-President
Mark Semotiuk Secretary Treasurer
Julie Lanz Director of Policy and Advocacy
Arielle Wasserman Director of Events and CLE Programming
Kristin Ali Canada Representative
Joanna Langille Director of Academic Outreach
“Join the Cross-Border Legal Conversation”

Major Partners

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only. The CABA does not guarantee the accuracy of any information contained herein. The CABA does not endorse organizations or information linked to or from this website. Any legal information provided is not intended to be legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship between the CABA or its directors, officers, or members and the reader. CABA is a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.